Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Argument Schemes and Critical Questions for Decision Aiding Process
Our ambition in this paper is to begin to specify in argumentative terms (some of) the steps involved in a decision-aiding process. To do that, we make use of the popular notion of argument schemes, and specify the related critical questions. A hierarchical structure of argument schemes allows to decompose the process into several distinct steps—and for each of them the underlying premises are ...
متن کاملCritical Questions in Computational Models of Legal Argument
Two recent computational models of legal argumentation, by Verheij and Gordon respectively, have interpreted critical questions as premises of arguments that can be defeated using Pollock’s concepts of undercutters and rebuttals. Using the scheme for arguments from expert opinion as an example, this paper evaluates and compares these two models of critical questions from the perspective of argu...
متن کاملArgument Schemes and Critical Questions for Heterogeneous Agents to Argue over the Viability of a Human Organ for Transplantation
In this paper we present a framework in which heterogeneous agents can argue over the viability of a human organ for transplantation. This collaborative decision making process among human and/or software agents is mediated by a software agent that uses argument schemes and critical questions to direct the deliberation, and determines a final evaluation of the given arguments. The proposed mode...
متن کاملThe Nature and Status of Critical Questions in Argumentation Schemes
Argumentation schemes are common types of defeasible argument evaluated with critical questions. This position paper identifies and explores some unsolved problems pertaining to critical questions, such as their argumentative effects, their connection to burden of proof, their connection to the scheme itself, and how they should be represented in argument diagrams. Discussion will use the schem...
متن کاملAdvances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions
This paper begins a working-through of Blair’s (2001) theoretical agenda concerning argumentation schemes and their attendant critical questions, in which we propose a number of solutions to some outstanding theoretical issues. We consider the classification of schemes, their ultimate nature, their role in argument reconstruction, their foundation as normative categories of argument, and the ev...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Argumentation
سال: 2020
ISSN: 0920-427X,1572-8374
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-020-09512-4